|
| My
Review (26-03-99) |
Plot
Synopsis: New York, 1941. Barton Fink (John Turturro), a playwrite,
has made it big in the New York theatre scene. He has written
a play, that has received rave reviews in the press, about the
common man, fishmongers to be precise. Barton plays down his evident
success as he has a vision, a vision of "a new, living theatre
of, about, and for the common man!" Now Hollywood wants a
piece of that "Barton Fink feeling". At first Barton
is hesitant about taking the job he has been offered (to write
movie scripts for Capitol Pictures for between $1000 and $2000
per week) but he is talked into it by Garland, his agent.
Barton, wanting to remain as close to the common
man, the main source of his inspiration, shuns the swanky Los
Angeles hotels he is offered and chooses to stay in the Hotel
Earle, which is, by all accounts, a horrid, grotty dive. From
the second Barton enters the hotel things start to get more
than a little odd. The hotel lobby is completely devoid of people
and the reception is unmanned. Barton rings the desk-top bell
and it's ring continues to sound indefinitely. After, what seems
like minutes, Chet (Steve Buscemi) the hotel bell boy appears
from a trap door behind the counter. After a bizarre conversation
about transients and residents, Barton makes his way to his
room. The rooms at the Hotel Earle are absolutely horrible,
with damp, peeling, tacky wallpaper and the worst selection
of furniture you could imagine including a bed with a worn-out,
sunken mattress and the heat in the hotel is almost unbearable.
His room contains a picture of a woman sitting on the beach
looking out to sea, for some reason Barton is transfixed by
the picture often stares at it. Yes, Barton is slumming it for
the common man.
He meets with Jack Lipnick (Michael Lerner
in a role which got him nominated for Best Performance By an
Actor in a Supporting Role at the 1991 Academy Awards), the
studio MD who instantly brown-noses Barton, and Lou Breeze (Jon
Polito), his underling, to discuss what he will write. Lipnick
speaks quickly, spurting words like a machine gun would bullets,
Barton cannot get a word in edge-ways. From the conversation
Barton is given a film to write, a Wallace Beery wrestling picture,
and he returns to the hotel to begin work.
Barton sits down at his trusty typewriter to
begin work. Unfortunately, he has no experience of writing film
or even watching them for that matter and he gets a massive
case of writer's block. All he can come up with to begin his
film is the exact same scene that began his much lauded play
(A tenement building on Manhattan's Lower East Side. Early morning
traffic is audible, as is the cry fishmongers) and the great
line 'A large man in tights'. Muffled laughter from the room
next door disturbs him further and his frustration boils over.
He 'phones down to Chet to complain, Chet assures him that he'll
sort it out. Seconds later we hear footsteps from next door
followed by a loud knock on Barton's door. Nervously he opens
it, to reveal a tubby man, Charlie Meadows (John Goodman) who
doesn't look at all pleased. Phoning downstairs could possibly
have been the worst thing Barton could have done- EVER. After
a brief discussion Charlie apologises (like hell) for disturbing
Barton and invites himself in for a drink. Eventually Barton
and Charlie become good friends and spend much of the movie
talking (and wrestling!).
Barton's writer's block gets to him so much
that he goes to speak to the movie's assigned producer, Ben
Geisler (Tony Shalhoub) who advises him to speak to another
writer. Barton, quite by co-incidence, meets W.P. Mayhew (John
Mahoney), an alcoholic novelist who is now writing for the pictures.
He is a hero of Barton's and he agrees to speak with Barton
back at the writer's building at the studio. When Barton goes
to Mayhews room the door is answered by a woman, Audrey Taylor
(Judy Davis), who introduces herself as Mayhew's Personal Assistant
and lover. Mayhew is a drunk who beats Audrey and she has written
much of the work he is famous for, for him. Barton's opinion
of Mayhew is blown to pieces.
With a dead line looming Barton rings Audrey
for some help writing his script and ends up sleeping with her.
Now a turn for the worst. Barton is woken by the buzzing of
a mosquito, to find that Audrey is dead and is lying in a massive
pool of blood. In a panic he screams and Charlie comes to check
what is wrong with his friend. At first Charlie is made sick
by the sight and then orders Barton in to the bathroom while
he sorts out the mess. When he returns Barton has passed out
on the bathroom floor. Charlie wakes him by slapping him in
the face. Once he's awake Charlie instructs him to act like
nothing has happened. Next day Charlie knocks on Bartons door
and tells him that he has to go away on business and asks him
to mind a brown paper-wrapped box, which he says contains a
lot of personal stuff, until he returns. Barton gets scared
about being left alone but Charlie reassures him that he'll
be back soon.
Barton is visited by two police officers asking
about his associations with Charlie Meadows. They tell Barton
that Meadows is a fake name and that Charlie's real name is
Karl Mundt or Madman Mundt to his friends, who has apparently
been on a bit of a killing spree "ventilating people with
shotguns and then cutting their heads off". They go on
to mention that they found a headless, female corpse near by,
Barton denies all knowledge of it.
When he returns to his room Barton places Charlie's
box on the table next to his typewriter and suddenly he can
write again. He writes continuously, ignoring the 'phone, until
he's finished. To celebrate the completion of his work he goes
for a dance and starts an almighty brawl with sailors and soldiers
over a girl. When he returns to his room the two cops are waiting
for him. Things don't look good for Barton as they've seen the
massive blood stain on his mattress. As the two cops interview
(read: insult) Barton the bell of the elevator sounds down the
hall and Barton knows it's Charlie because it has become unbearably
hot again. The cops step out into the hallway and Charlie steps
out of the elevator which appears to be on fire. Charlie pulls
a shotgun and blasts one of the cops in the chest, he runs up
the hall screaming "LOOK UPON ME! LOOK UPON ME! I'LL SHOW
YOU THE LIFE OF THE MIND!!", all the time fire follows
him done the corridor. Bang! He blasts the other cop in the
back of the leg and catches up with him and shoots him directly
in the face from close range. Charlie enters Barton's room and
talks to him like nothing has happened ("How you been,
Buddy?), he tells Barton that the box isn't actually his and
returns to his room next door. Barton gets up takes hold of
his script in one hand and the box in the other and leaves the
hotel.
In a meeting with Lipnick and Lou, Lipnick
tells Barton that his script was terrible and that Beery was
upset that the filming has to be pushed back. Barton leaves
and ends up strolling along a beach. He sits down in the sand
with his box beside him, when a beautiful girl sits down in
fant of him and adopts the exact pose as the girl in the painting.
My thoughts: Where do I start? Barton Fink
is one of the most bizarre movies I have ever seen, perhaps
the most bizarre thing about it is that it gets better every
time I watch it. When I first saw it, I've got to admit, I just
couldn't get my head around what was happening and found it
quite frustrating, but, on second viewing, I was amazed. The
whole film seemed a hell of a lot better, almost a different
film.
As is usual for a Coen Brother's film Barton
Fink is loaded with darkly comic moments (such as the scene
when Barton and Charlie wrestle in Barton's room) and it is
acted excellently particularly by Turturro, Goodman and Lerner.
Turturro gives the eponymous character a real sense of fragility
and weakness, encouraging the viewer to feel sorry for the loner
particularly when he struggling to shrug off his writer's block.
Barton is obviously dedicated to his art and the plight of the
common man and Turturro does a splendid job of portraying the
character. No surprise then that he won the award for Best Male
Performance at the 1991 Cannes Film Festival.
Goodman's character begins looking as though
he's going to be a nasty piece of work and then turns out to
be quite a nice, caring guy only to actually turn out to be
a nasty piece of work. This is Goodman at his best in a role
where the ambiguity of his definition is put across really well.
It is left to the audience to decide who/what Charlie really
is and what he is up to and what his goals are. He is obviously
a murderer and somewhat psychotic but is there more to him that
that...
Michael Lerner playing the Capitol Pictures
boss, Jack Lipnick, comes across as an arrogant, greedy movie
mogul who is keen to please his writers, to a point but will
definitely speak his mind if he doesn't like something. He completely
over-shoots everyone, particularly Lou and speaks at the speed
of light. The scene where he kisses Barton's feet seems completely
against character and I can't, for the life of me, work out
why a man with his power would grovel like that to anyone let
alone a first time movie script writer.
All of the acting is top-notch with some splendid
small roles for Coen regulars Buscemi, Polito and Mahoney. Buscemi
as Chet, the Hotel bell boy is excellent and seems to really
fit the role. Polito as the grovelling yes-man Lou Breeze is
convincing in the sense that you feel that he used to be big
and has been down-trodden by Lipnick over the years they have
worked together. Mahoney as W.P. Mayhew plays a drunken wash
out perfectly.
The script is brilliantly written (as usual)
with some truly strange characters (the lift attendant, Ben
Geisler, the two police detectives, the wrestler) and some unforgettable
lines, it must go down as a classic. Carter Burwell has provided
a musical score that is sooo subtle you almost don't notice
it but repeat viewing reveals some beautiful music that perfectly
suite the mood of the movie. The sets are fantastic, particularly
the Hotel Earle's rooms which really do add an air of claustrophobia
to proceedings and the effect of the heat on the decor is a
masterstroke. It goes without saying that the direction, right
from the opening shot is pure Coen and of the usual stellar
standard.
It has to be said that the film leaves you
asking more questions that it provides answers. Is Audrey's
head in the box? Why didn't Barton open it? If it was a head,
why didn't it start to smell? Is Charlie gay and in love with
Barton (hence his wrestling and the possible jealous murder
of Audrey)? Is Charlie the Devil? Is the Hotel Earle Hell? I've
read all of these theories and more but, I think that Charlie
could well be Satan since it is always hotter when he's in the
hotel and it may explain the bizarre nature of the fire in the
corridor, and the Hotel Earle could be Hell in some bizarre
Coen view of the Hollywood Studio system and in light of the
fact that the number 6 is mentioned three times in the lift
and Chet took such a long time to climb up to the reception
desk from below that maybe he was coming up from Hell. Then
again I could be reading more into the film than there is! Maybe
the Coen Brother's were quite happy to just go with every bizarre
idea they had without a thought as to what it may mean or be
perceived as. Maybe it's up to the individual to decide what
the hell they think is going on. Guess we'll never know...
All in
all I am so glad that I gave this film a second chance and watched
it with my brain turned on as it is one of the best films the
Coen's have made, second only to Fargo in my book.
|
|
|
EMPIRE ONLINE REVIEW: 4
STARS
|
This
black Valentine to 40s Hollywood is hugely enjoyable for the cinema
buff - style, wit and in-jokes abound in equal measure. Barton
Fink (Turturro) is a lofty leftie playwright - not unlike Clifford
Odets - lured of his noble artistic course to a Hollywood studio
by big bucks after his New York agent has reassured him that "the
common man will still be here when you get back." In a mausoleum
of an L.A. hotel where everything is slightly off-kilter, Fink
attempts to meet the requirements of the philistine studio boss
- played not unlike Louis B. Mayer in a marvellous turn by Michael
Lerner. Fink promptly comes down with a serious tragi-comic attack
of writer's block, his angst and nervous deterioration paralleled
by the state of his hotel room. Even more worrying is his reluctant
embroilment in the unhappy and peculiar affairs of others - a
bluff, hearty, not-what-he-appears-to-be clod in the next room
(Goodman), and the drunken Great American Writer in decline -
not unlike F. Scott Fitzgerald - played by John Mahoney. Naturally
there's a skirt/muse in the shape of Judy Davies. The allusions
and illusions on display here are a pure joy until about two-thirds
of the way in, when a shocking development takes the film off
into psycho-horror territory that is almost as baffling as it
is unsatisfying. No one can deny the result is, unsurprisingly
from these boys, visually enthralling - just don't ask what the
heck it all means.
Angie
Errigo.
|
|
LEONARD
MALTIN REVIEW: 2.5 stars out of 4 |
Self-important
NY playwright Turturro comes to Hollywood in 1941 to write a screenplay,
and finds it a living hell—in more ways than one. Barbed
look at vintage Hollywood, filled with incredible detail and amazing
scenes; told in Joel and Ethan Coen's typically flamboyant visual
style. But, at a crucial point the film takes a sharp left turn
toward the bizarre, and never returns. Great performances all
around.
|
|
ROGER
EBERT REVIEW: 3.5 stars out of 4 |
If
there is a favorite image in the movies by the Coen brothers,
it's of crass, venal men behind desks, who possess power the heroes
envy. Maybe that's because, like all filmmakers, the Coens have
spent a lot of time on the carpet, pitching projects to executives.
In BLOOD SIMPLE, the guy behind the desk was M. Emmet Walsh, as
a scheming private detective. In RAISING ARIZONA, it was Trey
Wilson's furniture czar. In MILLER'S CROSSING, it was Albert Finney
as a mob boss. In BARTON FINK, it is Michael Lerner, as the head
of a Hollywood studio. All of these men are vulgar, smoke cigars,
and view their supplicants with contempt.
To their desks come characters who want to
make a deal with the devil. They know these men are evil, compromised,
and corrupt. But they want what they have—a lot of money.
BARTON FINK, the latest Coen film (directed by Joel, produced
by Ethan, written by both) tells the story of a man who would
like to sell out to Hollywood, if only he had the talent. Barton
Fink is a left-wing New York playwright, modeled on the Clifford
Odets of Waiting for Lefty, who writes one proletarian hand-wringer
in the late 1930s and then is summoned to Hollywood, where Jack
Lipnick (Lerner), the vulgarian in charge of Capitol Pictures,
pays him piles of money and assigns him to write a wrestling
picture for Wallace Beery.
Fink, played with a likable, dim earnestness
by John Turturro, checks into an eerie hotel that looks designed
by Edward Hopper. There is apparently only one other tenant,
the affable Charlie Meadows (John Goodman), a traveling salesman
who lives next door and says he could tell Fink a lot of interesting
stories. But Fink, who claims to be the poet of the working
man, is not interested in a real proletarian, and spends most
of his time staring at his typewriter in despair. He has writer's
block.
Lou Breeze (Jon Polito), the studio czar's
right-hand man, tells Fink he should look up W.P. Mayhew (John
Mahoney), another great American writer on the studio payroll.
Mayhew is obviously modeled on William Faulkner, and Mahoney,
with a mustache, is his uncanny double. Fink arrives breathlessly
at the great man's feet, only to discover that he is a raving
drunk and that his "secretary" (Judy Davis) has written
most of his recent work. The three go on a picnic one day, and
the scene builds into a wry comic vignette—some satire,
some slapstick.
Like all of the Coen productions, BARTON FINK
has a deliberate visual style. The Hollywood of the late 1930s
and early 1940s is seen here as a world of Art Deco and deep
shadows, long hotel corridors, and bottomless swimming pools.
And there is a horror lurking underneath the affluent surface.
Goodman, as the ordinary man in the next room, is revealed to
have inhuman secrets, and the movie leads up to an apocalyptic
vision of blood, flames, and ruin, with Barton Fink unable to
influence events with either his art or his strength.
The Coens mean this aspect of the film, I think,
to be read as an emblem of the rise of Nazism. They paint Fink
as an ineffectual and impotent left-wing intellectual, who sells
out while telling himself he is doing the right thing, who thinks
he understands the "common man" but does not understand
that, for many common men, fascism had a seductive appeal. Fink
tries to write a wrestling picture and sleeps with the great
writer's mistress, while the Holocaust approaches and the nice
guy in the next room turns out to be a monster.
It would be a mistake to insist too much on
this aspect of the movie, however, since BARTON FINK is above
all a black comedy in the tradition of David Lynch, Luis Buñuel,
and the Coens themselves. Turturro is the right man for the
role, making Fink a plodding, introspective, unsure intellectual
whose lack of insight is matched only by his lack of talent.
The movie is a little unfair to Odets, its inspiration (even
if he did go to Hollywood in the late 1930s and write a boxing
picture, GOLDEN BOY, which did not drip with political commitment).
But it is even more unfair, hilariously, to Faulkner, whose
works were not written by a "secretary," but who was
by all accounts just as much of a boozer as the Mayhew character.
BARTON FINK won the Palme d'Or at the 1991
Cannes Film Festival, and an unprecedented two more prizes as
well, for director and actor. Since Cannes juries traditionally
limit themselves to one award per film, their ecstasy would
seem to indicate BARTON FINK is one of the greatest films ever
made. It is not. But it's an assured piece of comic filmmaking,
and perhaps a warning by the Coens to themselves about what
can happen when brilliant young talents from the East make that
trek out to the land of the guys behind the desks.
|
|
| CINEBOOKS' MOTION PICTURE
GUIDE REVIEW: 3.5 stars out of 5 |
|
The grand-prize winner at
the Cannes Film Festival, BARTON FINK is the fourth installment
in the Coen brothers' series of highly stylized homages to classical
Hollywood. But like their other films, BARTON FINK is a tour de
force of cinematic technique that encases a quirky narrative of
little depth.
Synopsis: Writer makes good. Barton
Fink (John Turturro) is an earnest young New York playwright who
hits it big with a Depression-era proletarian drama before being
reluctantly seduced by a lucrative offer to go to Hollywood and
write for the movies. Despite assurances from studio boss Jack
Lipnick (Michael Lerner) that he will be given free rein, Barton
is asked to write a wrestling picture for Wallace Beery. Pent
up in a surreal hotel room, Barton suffers acute and hallucinatory
writer's block.
Barton's funk is broken by two
encounters. First comes a visit from Charlie Meadows (John Goodman),
a gregarious traveling salesman who immediately befriends the
writer. Barton confesses his desire to write stories of the common
man, but ignores the tales this Willie Loman has to tell. Next,
paying a visit to the studio, he is further perplexed by the absurdities
of the movie executives he watches at work. Hope returns, however,
when he makes a second acquaintance. Also on the studio writing
staff is the legendary W.P. Mayhew (John Mahoney), an alcoholic
Southern novelist who hasn't written a word since coming to Hollywood.
Barton is disillusioned when he learns that W.P. is a cynical
fraud whose work is done by his personal secretary, Audrey Taylor
(Judy Davis). Audrey becomes Barton's caretaker as well. Her visit
to his room turns from a writing session to a sexual encounter.
Descent into hell. Barton's bliss
suddenly becomes a nightmare, however, when he awakes with Audrey'
bloody corpse in his bed. Charlie rescues Barton from his panic
by disposing of the body, then says goodbye. A post-traumatic
Barton furiously produces a screenplay in his proletarian style,
but his imagined success is short-lived. The police inform him
that Charlie is actually a serial killer. Just as Barton himself
is about to be arrested, Charlie returns, killing the cops and
leaving the shaken playwright in the midst of a blazing fire that
has suddenly taken over the hotel. Barton's descent into hell
concludes with his studio boss informing him that his script stinks
but that he must remain indentured to the studio. The beleaguered
artist winds up aimlessly wandering on the beach, where he encounters
an incarnation of the nameless bathing beauty whose picture hung
above his writing desk.
Critique: A send-up of Hollywood.
Unlike their previous works (the film noir BLOOD SIMPLE, the screwball
comedy RAISING ARIZONA, and the gangster film MILLER'S CROSSING),
BARTON FINK is not a revisionist take on a classical genre but
a bizarre, comic portrayal of the Hollywood studio system of the
1930s and 40s. The principal characters are clearly drawn from
actual people in that system: Fink is a thinly veiled version
of Clifford Odets, the leftist playwright who departed the socially
committed Group Theatre in New York to write screenplays in Hollywood
during WWII. And W.P. Mayhew is, of course, William Faulkner.
Lerner outstanding mogul. But
the scene-stealer is Jack Lipnick, the larger-than-life movie
mogul who is a composite of MGM's Louis B. Mayer and other studio
heads. Michael Lerner's portrayal of Lipnick overwhelms even the
fine acting of the leading players, not the least of which is
Goodman's transformation from a lonely salesman into a psychotic
killer. As Barton, John Turturro (DO THE RIGHT THING, MILLER'S
CROSSING) can only deadpan his way amid these caricatures while
careening from one baffling encounter to the next.
A hollow accomplishment. The film's
period decor, mood lighting, and artful camerawork are beautiful,
at times thrilling, to look at. The surrealistic writer's block
scenes, in which Barton silently watches wallpaper peel and its
paste ooze, are particularly memorable—imagine ERASERHEAD
in color. Ultimately, however, the look, sound, and feel of this
macabre comedy fail to support any coherent theme. The bombastic
Philistines of Hollywood, the idealistic artists of the theater,
and the "common man" are all rather cruelly skewered
in the film's finely polished characterizations. Much is denigrated,
but little affirmed. The film's artifice provides more than enough
brilliance and dazzle, but in the end one is left asking what
it all means. |
|